Christine Ho Younghusband

Focused on Student Learning

My IGNITE presentation below… what a great class… Week 12 and we’re nearing the end of the course. It’s been super fun and I really appreciated listening to your IGNITEs. I was IGNITED. Thank you #EDUC454E100 Summer Session 2018 at SFU Surrey. You rocked!!!

#EDUC454E100 – Week 12 – July 26, 2018

SLIDE 1

THIS is my first course that I started teaching as “DOCTOR” Christine Younghusband… I taught EDUC471 twice before and EDUC454 last year in the morning at Burnaby Campus. It was an awesome learning environment for 454. We were OUTSIDE everyday.

SLIDE 2

So when I got my appointment for this summer, I knew that teaching EDUC454 as a NIGHT COURE at Surrey Campus was going to be a challenge… It wasn’t going to be the same course as last year but I was open to change and wondered if we would ever get outside.

SLIDE 3

Approaching this course, I wanted to try out some of the principles from BC’s New Curriculum. As someone who was part of the Math K-9 Curriculum Development Team, I wanted to see the potential of this curriculum. I wasn’t going to be in the classroom so… why not try, play, and experiment with PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS?

SLIDE 4

Based on my research, we learn best from experience… So I wanted to try a few things and personalize YOUR learning, build math efficacy, engage in inquiry based learning, and have YOU facilitate interdisciplinary learning activities as pre-service teachers while looking at the CORE COMPETENCIES.

SLIDE 5

I created a FRAMEWORK of learning. Although this is not a Venn diagram, it depicts exactly what I was hoping for. The underpinning of your teaching practice is your subject specialty or grade level, with quantitative approaches to environmental education embedded into your practice.

SLIDE 6

I wanted to create a LEARNING COMMUNITY and build collective efficacy… so that we could co-create the course together. I wanted us to define what QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION means to us. Thank you Gillian Judson for getting us OUTSIDE.

SLIDE 7

I also want to thank DAVE BARNUM who talked about HIS PASSIONS of journaling, place-based learning, and community based learning. Both Gillian and Dave came to our class on their OWN TIME to share their passion with us and I am very grateful that they did.

SLIDE 8

I am also grateful for EARLY ADOPTERS… who were willing to take a RISK and PLAY. Learning should be FUN, ENGAGING, and MEANINGFUL. I loved the diversity and your creativity in each student led activity… for warm ups, group facilitations, and reading summaries.

SLIDE 9

I loved how we were able to share our passion and expertise with each other. We were engaged and wanted to learn more. When 60 minutes felt like 20, this is a good sign. We were able to be FLEXIBLE with time, space, and content. I did not want to be held back by grading or strict rules.

SLIDE 10

We were able to COLLABORATE with each other and co-plan interdisciplinary learning activities with fellow pre-service teachers and try something new. I knew by WEEK 6 that there was NO WAY I could plan the details of this course better than what you had contributed.

SLIDE 11

When learning activities were well planned and facilitated well, we achieved a level of student engagement that was no only empowering, but meaningful. There was no question in my mind that we were MEETING EXPECTATIONS.

SLIDE 12

I was so proud that we had students acknowledging the unceeded territory but also delve into indigenous education, have deep conversations about land, place, and identity, and sharing something that was meaningful to us, thus meaningful, purposeful, and personalized.

SLIDE 13

We also took the opportunity to be creative and witty with our learning activities where at one moment we thought we were engaging in the AMAZING RACE, but in the end, we were engaged in something much more deep, historical, and relevant. Feelings I won’t forget.

SLIDE 14

We did get a little competitive at times and took opportunities to EXPERIMENT, continue a story, or participate in MAKER SPACE that can be adapted or modified. I loved how we could be CURIOUS about what we were teaching and learning.

SLIDE 15

FINALLY, we were able to overcome MANY unforeseen challenges and made the best out of the situation. Sometimes we couldn’t be outside. Sometimes we ran out of time. In the end, “WE ARE TEACHERS” and we can adapt.

SLIDE 16

The last thing I wanted to do in this class was be the SAGE ON THE STAGE… I wanted to facilitate learning and be the GUIDE ON THE SIDE. My work was invisible to many of you and I wanted to focus on student learning. Much of what I do happens BEFORE and AFTER the course… and behind the scenes.

SLIDE 17

If I was back in the Math classroom again… I would definitely GO OUTSIDE and use the ENVIRONMENT as a learning tool. I also learned that MATH is INTERDISCIPLINARY and DESCRIPTIVE. I would definitely collaborate with other teachers to create and facilitate meaningful and memorable learning experiences for students.

SLIDE 18

As you know, the LEARNING CYCLE involves doing, reflecting, reimagining, and trying again. My biggest take away is COMMUNICATING STUDENT LEARNING. Each student needs DESCRIPTIVE FEEDBACK on how things went. BLOGGING was not enough.

SLIDE 19

I also wanted to announce to you… I have just accepted a full-time lecturer position at the University of Northern British Columbia in the School of Education starting August 1^st… but we are still doing the YOUNGHUSBAND OUTDOOR MATH ADVENTURE next week on August 2^nd.

SLIDE 20

So THANK YOU for coming on this journey with me… FOCUSED ON STUDENT LEARNING… that’s flexible, dialogical, and fun. Admittedly, I leaned on the COMPETENCIES versus content, but I am satisfied with what was demonstrated and experienced.

September 28, 2018 – Please note: photos were removed based on course evaluations.

The Closers

#EDUC454E100 – Week 11 – July 19, 2018

We are nearing the end of EDUC454 course at SFU Surrey. This is our last week of student-led learning activities. Next class we are heading into our summative assessments with IGNITE, one-page journal summary, and inquiry project. It’s absolutely amazing how this class took over the course. That was my intention. Admittedly, I may have underestimated how much time students needed to delve deep into their warm-up activities, reading summaries, and group facilitation. The other thing I have learned is that students are juggling other classes and LIFE, so some things that are posted online via Canvas may or may not be completed. I understand the complexity of university life, but I also understand how assessment influences learning. I will reveal during my IGNITE presentation that I wanted these students to play, experiment, and learn risk free.

This was our last group facilitation learning activity. This group planned their learning activity to be OUTSIDE. As you can see, we are INSIDE. Another Thursday where Holland Park is closed due to organizing for a community event. Much like other student led learning activities in previous weeks, we had to make adaptions… with space, place, and time. Some had their activities postponed while others managed to facilitate in class. This group opted to contact SFU Surrey security to see if we could use the mezzanine. Thank goodness for another student for sending me a message indicating to me that the park was being closed off due to the Fusion Festival. I passed on the message. This group anticipated a possible park closure… and here we are.

This group wanted to be situated in place… Holland Park… because their learning activity involved using space to Cooperatively Design an Amusement Park in Holland Park. They wanted teams to look and observe the surroundings in addition to have “real people” engage in their planning. This is the unfortunate of our circumstance because we could not postpone this learning activity (it’s the last week) and we needed space and the interaction of others to be a part of this learning experience. So… the group settled with the SFU Surrey’s mezzanine and I like to thank Sandy from SFU for supporting our class, gracefully accommodating us, and managing the short notice (as she was in the midst of setting up a stage adjacent to us). Overcoming this obstacle, this team borders off the learning space with yarn. You’d be surprised how many people OBEYED THE YARN but also observed what EDUC454 students were doing. We were showing off our learning.

I loved the problem based learning of this learning activity, much like last week’s group facilitation. Teams were given a problem… To design an amusement park in Holland Park. We had to consider potential problems and possible benefits to the environment and community. Before we started, we acknowledged the Squamish, Musqueam, Tsleil-Waututh, Katzie and Kwikwetlem peoples on whose unceded traditional territories the three SFU campuses stand. Once given the problem, teams had to brainstorm for a few minutes about what they wanted to create, then they sent in one representative to negotiate with other team representatives as to what space they needed and ensure that there was no duplicates of ideas. After negotiations, it did not take very much time to place MORE YARN to and how one of the group members even brought a wagon to the university to bring supplies for students to work with to create a model of their design.

Ideas ranged from a zipline, a slide, a nature-based park, and a non-environmentally friendly gymnasium area that was situated under a dome (but would make lots of money). I liked how groups were collaborating and making the best of the situation. People who walked through the mezzanine did look to see what was going on. I wonder what this activity would have been like had we been situation in Holland Park with “real” community members engaging with us. That said, the outcome was creative and each team had to report out to others what their ideas were and how one area of the park influenced the other. A student was recording problems faced in their group and how they resolved them. This would have been another interesting discussion to have for this learning activity to describe how they were modelling design thinking and how it works.

In the end, I appreciated how students in the class actively and willingly participate in the group facilitation learning activities. They take about 1.5 hours and sometimes we would take a week or so to delve into the learning activity deeper to explore the possibilities of what they have designed and created. It would also be fun to have the opportunity to engage in self and peer assessment to identify some ways to improve the learning activity and having the opportunity to try again. That would be ideal. That would be leaning towards a methodology class but also it leans towards deeper learning and how we can create these learning experiences for our students. Something to consider in future.

We head back to class after the break (and course evaluations) to head into our last reading summaries. Another student enjoyed the article, Heart of a Teacher, and spoke about the perceptions of teaching if one is not clear about one’s identity and integrity in teaching. While another student did the written summary but I want to include it here as she did hers on PowToon because she wanted to learn more about the application. Why not? Click link below:
https://www.powtoon.com/c/g5zC9hp1Krv/1/m

This student on the other hand opted to make a YouTube video for her Oral Presentation to summarize the weekly reading. It was nicely done. Please watch YouTube below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_754dw3aaQ

The class concludes with three warm-up activities. The first one was facilitated was an awesome activity focused on vocabulary, sense-making, and student composition of meaning. I loved this activity. I would definitely use this one in a high school math or science class. Tami made unique word sets for each group. One person faces away from the board and has to guess the word while the other two are trying to describe the word without using the word. I love the collaboration and innovation needed to do this well.

The second warm up activity involved taking us outside of the classroom. This student acknowledged the unceeded territory and placed markers around the oval. He spoke about his identity and heritage and asked us to walk around the oval to find markers of continents of relative distance away from North America or Vancouver. The student facilitator stayed behind while the rest of us moved forward. A huge cluster of us stopped a Europe, a smaller cluster at Asia, and one person stopped in Africa. We each had small group discussions in these smaller groups talking about place, heritage, and personal identity. After a few minutes, we were asked to return back to class and the student facilitated a discussion. I was so wowed by the concept of distance, being of first generation Canadian, and loss of language thus no connection to culture or may heritage. The discussion was AMAZING and could have lasted a lot longer because it was meaningful, personal, and purposeful. To get a sense of our discussion, Erin and Stephen mentioned this video clip from the Daily Show with Trevor Noah (Behind the Scenes):  https://twitter.com/TheDailyShow/status/1019751037853241344 

We go overtime and our last warm up activity was an IMPLICIT/EXPLICIT activity where students had to draw an important place to them. They traded pictures with a partner and that person had to describe what that saw explicitly and implicitly in the picture, then tell the other what they saw. The room was chatty soon after drawing. Once again, another student led learning activity condensed to 10-15 minutes when it could last for 1-2 hours. It’s amazing what we accomplish in so little time. It also tells me, to focus on the competencies and deeper learning, you need to make and take the time to do it.

No weekly journal questions this week. Poorly timed on my part, but there were some optional questions and excellent questions posed by students for discussion inspired by our last weekly reading, Heart of a Teacher – Identity and Integrity in Teaching by Parker Palmer (1998). Who was my favourite teacher? Mr. Negus (Drafting 11). My not so favourite teacher? (No comment). What I loved about Mr. Negus was that he loved what he taught, he respected students as equals, and he challenged my thinking in a playful and thoughtful way. I could say that about a few other favourite teachers. They loved what they were teaching and they oozed their subject area. Their passion for what they taught was evident and motivated me to learn. It’s like what Palmer said in the YouTube video… I remember how these teachers made me feel, not what they had taught me.

We Are Teachers

#EDUC454E100 – Week 10 – July 12, 2018

Voila. After 10 weeks of classes, here is my first POSED picture by student request. Of course it has to be the blog photo feature of the week. Thank you for this… it really made my day. As mentioned in my last blog, the week before was a week a deliberation as to how to approach assessment and evaluation in EDUC454E100 without losing focus on student learning. This was a tough conversation to have particularly when I have be operating as the “guide on the side” and some students still had to facilitate learning activities this class and the class after. I did not want to influence their performance with my “lecture” on assessment and evaluation. I had to make my intentions explicit.

We were talking about formative versus summative assessment. We talked about how some assignments in my class were pass or fail (i.e. 20% or 0%) based on meeting the criteria of integrating environmental education, quantitative approaches, and their subject area or area of interest together… or summarizing the reading and asking good questions. What did it mean to MEET EXPECTATIONS and climbing towards a ceiling or working from the basement. We talked about focusing on student learning versus student achievement, which sometimes gets in the way of learning. I gave a few examples from my practice in higher education when formative feedback is useful and when it’s not useful. A long story made short, I think my class understood what I was talking about and I am grateful.

I even appreciated the few students who stayed behind after the end of the first half of our class to let me know that they are dealing with different assessment and evaluation practices in other classes, so it gets confusing and habitual. They appreciated what I was trying to achieve and I was even more grateful that they would stay behind to clean the boards and move tables back with me. These are the little things that make me love teaching and learning with students… particularly student teachers. What was even more amazing is, the student led learning activities were outstanding. I cannot believe how these students were able to make things happen wholeheartedly and adapt so easily.

I was feeling for the student who had to follow my assessment lecture and give his presentation. He was providing the reading summary for this week on sustainability. I loved how he took the reading (with honesty) and approached the document as intended. He shared with the class one of his assessments on how well he was doing with one of the checklists and provided himself a rubric or Likert Scale on performance with each bullet point, as seen below. I loved the use of technology and using one of the checklists to see how well he was doing with sustainability. He posed a few questions to discuss on what could be done in schools and another student offered the Weekly Journal Questions (see end of blog) to address for Week 10. Both students “met expectations.”

We then transition into the warm-up activity. We start of with two students facilitating a game of SPOONS. I never heard of the game but I really like the premise behind it. 4 teams, 3 spoons, and a fork. Each team brainstorms a list of 10 words related to the key word announced by either student facilitator. Once you finish your list, you grab a spoon (or fork). If you are the team left with the fork, you don’t “get any points” for the round. I love collaborative and cooperative games. They had to rotate players per round. This would be an excellent activity to work through a list of terms for a class or related topics. It could be a summative or formative learning activity. Students were engaged and I appreciated using Non-Permanent Vertical Surfaces as a learning tool.

I could not help myself but to interject and talk about the Core Competencies. It’s something that I wanted to incorporate into my class because it is something that the field is currently grappling with and these pre-service teachers will soon be their peers. I also wanted to explore what it means for students to self-assess their core competencies and play with some ways students can keep this as an ongoing conversation along side with the curricular competencies and content. So, I facilitated a second part to this warm-up activity of co-creating “I can” statements in light of this warm-up of activity and state verbally how did they know that they were achieving or developing that core competency.

Well, it worked brilliantly as well as already being divided into groups for our next warm up activity with another student. He asked groups to brainstorm as many things their group members all had in common. I loved the dialogue and collaboration to make this list of commonalities. It was an excellent activity that I wished that we did at the beginning of the course instead of the end. This was another activity I asked the students if I could interject my thoughts and inclusion of the course intentions to what they were facilitating. After the students made their list, I asked them to place the letter “P” beside the items that reflected PLACE or the environment and “Q” for quantitative approaches or math. Some of the groups labelled all items either P or Q and some used PQ. I was only hoping for one of each to demonstrate that Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education is in everything that we do. This student concluded that this was an excellent “get to know me” activity to identify our likeness or commonalities versus differences between and with students, then facilitated a conversation on why differences are so important to students.

We headed outside to do our third (and postponed) warm up activity with two other students. Holland Park the week before was gated up due to a concert. They planned for an outdoor warm up activity and although we brainstormed possible ways to facilitate this activity indoors… in hindsight, I am so glad that we waited to do this activity outside.

This warm up activity was a continuation of a previous activity about the penguin who believed he could fly (re: math efficacy), now translated as a STEM or MakerSpace problem. Design a penguin who will fly the furthest distance given a limited use of materials and time to plan. This was very interesting, because the student facilitator did a demo of pasting wings to the picture of the penguin and made it fly (but not well).

One group developed a slingshot (that apparently broke before launching their penguin), another group made a paper airplane penguin and made it fly (as seen below in the photo below), one group opted not to fly their penguin (well, they walked it along), and the rest of the groups attached the penguin onto a rock and threw it… very far!!! The distance achieved exceeded what the student facilitators anticipated by 2.5 times. Time to adapt.

Then they asked a representative from each group to position themselves relatively on the xy-axis. That was a big idea and collaboratively they managed to plot themselves on a graph. I loved this idea. Relative distance. An opportunity to take extensions to this activity such as design a device to launch the penguin into the air… how high will he go?… how far will he travel? (e.g. quadratic functions, angles, trajectory, velocity, acceleration). I also like how this could be a statistics question of plotting central tendency, multiple trials, design thinking, and standard deviation. Many math opportunities that could be made meaningful to hypothesize the best way to help the penguin fly and why.

Finally, we end our class with the group facilitation learning activity. We switched the activities around to accommodate group members. I was so pleased with the group and their willingness to adapt. We came outside because of the warm up activity, as previously described, but I assumed that their activity was designed to be outside… and it wasn’t. But during the break, Ally said that it was OK for her group to facilitate their activity OUTSIDE. I love learning outside and I was so happy that they were willing to adapt. Moreover, we were running out of time and their time to facilitate dwindled from 1.5 hours to 45 minutes. They were up for the challenge and adapted their learning activity beautifully. A group of 4 students facilitated a Build Your Own City activity.

Students were divided up into teams and assigned a city. Each city has different biomes and wealth. This was the first activity in the course that used ECONOMICS as the quantitative approach to environmental education. They were CITY PLANNING. Building things like hospitals, schools, roads, etc… costs money. Each team was give an amount of money depending on what country they were and asked to BUILD THE BEST CITY under the circumstances. What a great discussion on values and making decisions on what was important for the people in that city. Before starting the activity, groups were asked what makes a good city. This is time for teams to put these thoughts into action.

This was not an easy activity, depending which city you are from AND that each city were struck with a natural disaster. With each disaster, they may lose important infrastructures like schools or government buildings. They had to find ways to rebuild their cities while still serve (as best they can) the people in their cities. This was an excellent learning activity as I could see all 3 core competencies in action in context to quantitative approaches to environmental education as it related to social studies, biology, geography, and economics. It’s very complex and one can see that this activity could last at least a week with students getting to the heart of civics, governance, and decision making,

Each group reported out their designs, decision-making, and constraints. We were so engaged in the work that we were doing that we were attracting community members who were strolling in the park to stop and listen to what the students had to say about building their own cities and how complex it is and how relationships with other countries matter when they need financial help given exceptional circumstances like a natural disaster. This learning activity was enjoyed by all such that students at the end of the activity requested the unit plan from this group. Well done Group 6. Given the circumstances, you adapted and excelled. As one said, “of course, we are teachers.”

Weekly Journal Questions

As a teacher, what actions do you plan on taking to improve sustainability in your school?

I like the self-assessment that one student. did during his presentation. I would like to do that with a class to help identify an area of need or of high priority in the school. Then, as mentioned in class, chose one or two areas to focus on during school year. Make it a theme for the course or a topic that the class returns to on a weekly basis to gather data, research the impact, and make changes to student attitudes and behaviour on that topic. I would like to make it a class approach to problem solving and creating the change that they want to see. I would only like to facilitate it and make cognitive space for students to wrestle with the topic and find viable solutions for the school to adopt.

What barriers are there to being a vocal advocate for issues like sustainability in a school?

Culture shifting. Policies. Rules and regulations. Habits of the mind. We do get caught in a routine and if sustainability is a new concept or operating at minimum expectations, it’s best to find others who you can team teach with or collaborate with in different subject areas or grades so that your class or classes can create a momentum to sustain change.

Do you agree that the goals in this guide are attainable?

I believe anything is attainable, but it takes time, patience, and persistence. It won’t be perfect, but it’s always about striving to get damn close to it. I would agree that you can’t do all of it at once. Choose one or two areas, learn from that experience, then transition to other areas when the first two has been widely accepted by the school community.

What is Formative?

#EDUC454E100 – Week 9 – July 5, 2018

Everyday I am learning. This day was no exception. I often wonder why I am doing what I am doing. This is not meant to be an existential blog entry but I am curious about how we can do what’s best to maximize the student learning experience without getting bogged down. Teaching is a complex practice that changes over time because it needs to be responsive to what’s happening in the world. I am always in the struggle of doing what I think others expect me to do versus what I want to do. My thinking always leans into “you never know unless you try.” Reflect. Accept feedback. Re-imagine. And, try again.

I am a big fan of experiential learning and Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle and Ericsson’s Deliberate Practice. We need to engage in something to get better (and better) at it. But how do you move forward. How do you bring things to an end? I am stuck between two worlds of tradition and innovation. Yes, I can understand George Couros’s suggestion of innovating inside the system, but there tends to be push back. For example, when designing the course EDUC454 this term I struggled between flooding students with readings and getting them to synthesize other people’s thinking and creating space and opportunities for student learning and students choice. To add to that dilemma and finding that “sweet spot”… assessment and evaluation clouds that decision making.

I am working in a system that has predetermined rules, expectations, and structures… but within that, like the course syllabus, the instructor has academic freedom and autonomy. I wanted to take this opportunity in teaching EDUC454, but also EDUC471 when I am teaching that course, to play around with some of the ideals of BC’s New Curriculum with the understanding of experiencing of what BC’s New Curriculum could be like as pre-service teachers. What does it mean to be in the implementation dip? Here I am. How do you receive formative feedback post demonstration of learning when there is no second opportunity to return back to the activity, unless offered? Furthermore, if formative feedback is to help and support student learning, it should happen before (or during) the demonstration of learning. Descriptive feedback can be provided as summative where students may take them as formative for the “next thing” they do.

I’ve been left thinking about this all week. Next class is TODAY (I’m a really late on reflecting on last class). I wanted to free students from the burden of grading and wanted to take a MEETING or NOT MEETING approach to the learning activities they are participating and facilitating during the course then leave the summative assessment or grading for the end of the course. What makes this complicated is that the learning activities that they had completed during the course are also summative in nature as it was a demonstration of understanding, we are not returning back to those activities, and they get “marks” for MEETING EXPECTATIONS for those activities. In our grading system, it seems so extreme though… 100% or 0%. Yikes! No wonder students get stressed out.

No wonder it’s a strange expectation for teachers to KNOW what exactly they are doing and why… but also create at structure or plan that you are not able to steer away from to meet student learning needs. This seems absolutely crazy to me. I am the professional. If a student makes a mistake, should they be punished or should they be supported such that I make adaptions to make the situation possible for the student? What I realized last class is, it is evident when people are motivated by grades versus motivated by learning. What to do I mean by that? If the expectation is “X” then those who are just concerned about getting the task done and “meet expectations” they make every effort to meet the expectation as if it was the CEILING. But for students who are motivated by the learning and learning experience, the expectation serves as the BASEMENT or floor to what’s possible. I am witnessing this… but is there a rubric to depict this? NO.

I am beginning to question all of what we are trying to do and achieve in schools. Where is the fun? Where is the love? Where is the joy? Do we talk about these attributes at all in education and if so, is it valued? I would suspect not if we don’t put a grade to it or if it’s not substantiated with a list of literature to say that it’s true. Can we not experience fun, love, and joy as part of our LEARNING? This is where we talked at length at the Math K-9 Curriculum Development Team a few years ago… Where is the WONDER in mathematics? How do we get students to wonder when we are focused on worksheets or memorizing the times table so that we can DO mathematics? There are many interests in education that’s pulling us into so many different directions… nothing is getting done. We remain in the status quo and the system remains resilient. Knowing this is not hopeful.

Maybe this blog did become a bit existential… This has been a challenging week which puts me into of a place of reflection. Yes, I’m back into the experiential learning cycle.

I would like to thank the group of 4 this week for facilitating Week 9’s group facilitation learning activity integrating art, nature, patterns, and technology. I enjoyed the GooseChase APP to document learning. It was challenging to decipher some of the metaphors connecting place and patterns, but I think all of the teams met the challenge. I also appreciated using hands on learning using art and nature as a form of reflection of our GooseChase experience. It makes me think further about how we can integrate technology as a learning tool in our classrooms but also hands on learning (like maker space) to sense make, reflect, and personalize learning. Metaphors and working with my hands are not my strengths but I can really appreciate how we can use innovative strategies to invite students into learning opportunities they may not feel comfortable with. I love how this could lend itself to ELA, social studies, and math.

Finally, thank you another student for taking the creative liberty of summarizing this week’s reading on curriculum maps. I liked how you had focused on the learning cycle instead of C.A.R.E., which we did at the beginning of the course. I also appreciated how you connected the learning cycle to your dad’s retirement and honouring him with shaving off your hair. That is BOLD. That is love. I feel honoured that you were willing to share that personal experience with the class and make a connection to the learning cycle. You got me thinking about where we can start in the learning cycle. I had always believed that the cycle started with a concrete experience. Yet, as you point out, it’s a cycle thus you could start anywhere on the cycle. You’ve heightened my thinking.

Weekly Journal Questions

„“All education is environmental education.” – David Orr
What are your thoughts on this statement?

Yes. I can see how environmental education can be an integral part of learning and learning experiences in all subject areas. If back in the classroom, I would like to teach outside and find ways where I could take my students outside to make meaningful and memorable learning experiences where they can take mathematics, for example, into place and connect what they know to the land. I would love to take that further in a Math 8-12 classroom and take learning outside that is meaningful and purposeful. „

„From page 9 of the Curriculum Maps reading, describe how EDUC454 has demonstrated each principle of C. A. R. E. and parts of the learning cycle.

COMPLEXITY: considering the complexity and interrelatedness of natural and human created systems, and how humans interact with and affect those systems
(GROUP FACILITATION)

AESTHETICS: developing an aesthetic appreciation for the natural world that encourages students to learn about and protect the environment
(GROUP FACILITATION/WARM-UP ACTIVITIES)

RESPONSIBILITY: providing opportunities for students to take responsible action and explore the environmental impact of their decisions and actions
(INQUIRY PROJECTS)

ETHICS: providing opportunities to practice an environmental ethic based on an examination of values that can give rise to new visions, possibilities and actions
(INQUIRY PROJECTS AND GROUP FACILITATION)

„Looking at the Curriculum Maps, find your subject specialty/grade level. Imagine and describe what a cross-curricular lesson would look like with respect to C.A.R.E., the learning cycle, and selected learning outcomes.

Math K-12 was suggested to be interdisciplinary… SO LET’S DO THIS!!! If back in the K-12 classroom, I would love to teach teach, co-collaborate, and design a course or unit that is cross-curricular, outside, and joyful. Let’s get math out of the silo and let’s interconnect.

The Amazing Race

#EDUC454E100 – Week 8 – June 28, 2018

A very clever name to this week’s group facilitation learning activity. The Amazing Race. We were all wooed by the lollipops. A group of 4 students started off the activity by offering each of us a lollipop and explaining the rules of the game. We were then divided into groups of 4 and asked to pick a team name. I was on Team We’re Not Creative. We then participated in several team activities: (1) Grab 2 different coloured wiffle balls BLINDFOLDED; (2) spin around a baseball bat and run; and (3) do a math problem about circles or take 5 photos. In hindsight, these all pretty dangerous activities. I did fall on my knee and rolled on the ground soon after the baseball bat spin.

I love how were were all willing to participate. We did not question the rules nor did we know what we were playing for. What we did know was, the lollipops were important. I was not sure if I should eat one or not. I was confused but played along. I was enjoying myself and I aced the circumference/diameter math problem. Our estimated answer turned out to be a nice rounded answer of d = 14.0 m. I was personally impressed. What I was not impressed about was having to be TURNED AROUND and have to do part 2 of station 3. It set us behind… but this setback played a role. We would soon find out why.

No pics of the three preliminary activities, however the picture below depicts the next stage of the game. There was definitely an “inner group” and an “outer group.” The initial teams were now non-existent and now we were divided into two larger teams. As a member of the “outer group,” I spent most of my time observing and wondering what was going on. Other members of my group were a little more activated and more willing to ask members of the “inner group” of what they had wanted and offered their lollipops with hopes of getting some answers. At first the “inner group” was silent, but as time went on they were more verbal but vague. I learned that 2 of my students spoke American Sign Language: one from the “inner group” and one from the “outer group.”

As a member of the “outer group,” our mission was to get INTO the circle. Look at them… there was NO WAY we were going to get in… and I felt that we didn’t have enough information to solve the problem. We did regroup a few times to strategize. I had the exact opposite response of TAKING their lollipops (later learning that their objective was to NOT let us in and accrue as many lollipops, particularly the orange ones). We had opposing objectives and would say that the “inner group” were achieving their goals. The “outer group” were failing because we were not inside the circle and losing lollipops.

Thank goodness, the group facilitators ended the game (it was getting frustrating) and we regrouped at first as “inner group” and “outer group.” Then we re-grouped as 50/50. This was eye opening. The facilitator in each sub-group asked members from the “inner” and the “outer” group to share what we understood and attempting to do. As mentioned, the “inner group” was trying to keep people out and collect lollipops. The “outer group” was trying to find a way in the circle and some of us had to go in as pairs, triplets, or as singles. We could use the lollipops but did not know how. We were then asked to reflect on how we felt. I remembered someone saying during the last activity, “what happened to the Amazing Race?” It wasn’t fun. Then we were asked to think about COLONIALISM.

Mind blown. What an amazing close to the Amazing Race… hence the clever title. I internalized the feelings of being marginalized, playing a game without knowing all of the rules, and losing. It was like solving a math problem without enough information, such that we are forced to hypothesize some possible solutions, but none of them worked. I was also stunned by the idea of competition and the mindset it instills on each of us. All I could think of with competition was SCARCITY. We were all willing to play without knowing how to win or lose. We were so trusting. As it turned out, the teams from the start of the game who placed a clear first and second were from the “inner group” and the clear losers were from the “outer group.” Each lollipop colour had a point value. This was calculated at the end of the activity. What a complex learning activity… it reminds me of the “brown eyes/blue eyes” experiment done 50 years ago to Grade 3 students.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/lesson-of-a-lifetime-72754306/

After the break, 2 other students lead us though a warm-up activity OUTDOORS after our break. Yes, we continue learning outside. We were doing relays and math problems related to environmentally conscious decision making. I liked that there was a connection to space and real life math problems that Grade 8 students can solve and consider. What caught my attention was the “best buy” concept. In Math 8, “best buy” means the cheapest or cost efficient. But, the math questions posed got students to reconsider what was more important… cost efficiency or carbon footprint. What we traditionally consider as “best buy” is changing and getting students to use, develop, and demonstrate their core competencies using critical/creative thinking, communication, and social justice and responsibility, students can DEFEND which is the “best buy” and explain why.

I love the next two speakers… and we’re back inside to summarize this week’s reading. 2 more students did an excellent job summarizing the article on math efficacy and math self-beliefs… by saying that the article could be reduced from 26 pages to 2 and that if you don’t feel good about math then you won’t do math. Although this seems obvious with respect to any learning, I was hoping that it was obvious to us as teachers that our math efficacy influences how students learn math even though they may or may not be teaching math when they enter the teaching profession. I am hoping that my students see that Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education is present and play a role in the curricular areas they are trained to teach. Math is DESCRIPTIVE.

One student opted to extend her presentation by sharing her math experience as a high school student. Another student opted to read us a small children’s book (in French and English) about a penguin who believed that he could fly. Both presentations were compelling and creative such that I started to engage with the class about their math experiences and perceived math efficacy such that we did not get to the discussion questions posed and while another student facilitated the closing activity (which is postponed for next week). My students had a lot to say. Some students would admit that they do not have a problem with math (which is great!!!), but others had traumatizing stories that they have (or hope to) overcome. One student said that she taught Math 8 during her practicum and loved it. The experience boosted her confidence. Her attitude was, if I don’t know it, we’ll figure it out... an awesome demonstration of vulnerability. That’s a part of it. I was surprised how similar some stories were from each other and I hope by the end of the course that their math self-beliefs will transform.

Weekly Journal Questions

You may or may not teach math when you enter the teaching profession. Regardless of job assignment, how does your mathematics self-beliefs influence how your students learn math? Or does it?„

SEE ABOVE

„Given what you have learned and experienced so far in EDUC454, how does mathematics (or quantitative approaches) fit into your subject specialty (or grade level)? How does environmental education?

SEE ABOVE

20 Days

I was always so happy when my mom would agree to take a selfie with me and the family. It was a rare moment. She did not particularly like taking photos. In fact, she hated them. Ironically, I think she takes the best photos out of all of us in the family. I guess she was modest that way… or vein. I say that kindly as I know how she feels when someone takes photos of me. This is my webpage about a book I am about to write… 20 days. At first, I thought I could write it in 20 days… That was an unrealistic goal. That said, it’s a tribute to my mom. She is an incredible woman. I realize this more each day.

We just celebrated her 81st birthday. June 27th. She would probably hate that I’m sharing anything about her online. We’d remember my mom’s birthday with the numbers”627.” It is one of the phone numbers prefixes in Prince Rupert, BC where we had lived together as a family for more than 20 years. Anyway, this webpage is an opportunity for me to make my writing and work visible. She is my superhero. I’m not sure how she’s done it, but I hope to write about her and make her proud. I will keep you updated as to how my writing evolves. This is a step into a different direction, yet the same. There is much teaching and learning to be had. My mom is my greatest teacher. I am proud of her.

Disclaimer: This book is written from my point of view… non-fiction… and I may embellish from time to time to fill in some gaps with random personal thoughts. I know that each member of my family has a different point of view of my mom’s story, so I am compelled to tell how I saw things as “number three” and hope that I write a fair depiction of her during the 20 days. My mom inspired me to write this book. I never considered myself a writer, but I do consider myself to be a teacher and learner. My dad wrote a self-published book about his memoirs that you can purchase online at Amazon.ca. “My Life’s Journey in Surviving Times – A Memoir. https://www.amazon.ca/My-Lifes-Journey-Surviving-Time/dp/1460253582 My mom was never one to share her stories. This is me doing some forensic science and taking the opportunity to share some of my mom’s stories.

Over Half Way

#EDUC454E100 – Week 7 – June 21, 2018

I cannot believe that we are over half way. We have completed 7 weeks of 13 and established the momentum of the course. We have arrived. The course is at a point where students are leading, personalizing their learning, and becoming more resourceful and imaginative of what possible with respect to teaching and learning in the context of Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education. I am pleased. It’s not about me downloading information from what I believe is true. I do that with my readings and course syllabus. The details and relevance come from the students. I collaborate from behind the scenes. I provide formative feedback. I am the “guide on the side.” Now that the class has seen and experienced a few exemplars from others in the class, students are finding their stride in this course. I am really enjoying their teaching and learning. Students should be active learners and co-constructors of knowledge. Sitting down and listening to me for 3.5 hours and preparing for an exam does not seem reasonable for this group of pre-service teachers. I love connecting what they are learning to their future practice. Learning by doing. It is challenging though to delve into deeper learning with diversity. That said, each group or individual as they prepare to present are delving in.

Our Group Facilitation by 4 students in the class was complex and interesting. You can really see how they had tried to incorporate many ideas into their learning activity. First, I love that we are back outside and the weather is playing along with us very nicely. I love how we gather in a circle and throwing our stuff in the middle. They passed around maps, questions, and mini flags. We talked about “true north” and our challenge was to ESTIMATE where we live (with respect to time) and where we were born (with respect to distance). Ratios and rates were used to help us measure our approximate distance from SFU Surrey (Big Flag, see picture above). We took large steps for each interval of time for our commute to SFU Surrey and took a tiny step for every 10km from where we were born. As you can see, we come from many different directions.

While placing and locating our flags, were were asked a few reflective questions about place. They asked us what we noticed en route of our commute and discuss these observations with our group. We were also asked about our hometown and how it was the same or different from where we live now. For me, I realized that I live in similar communities from where I was born and where I live. I was born and raised in Prince Rupert, BC… the northwest coast. It’s a small coastal community. Now, I live on the Sunshine Coast in Sechelt, BC… another small coastal community. I like to live near the ocean. I like the small town and the quietness. I like to raise my daughter in a small town where everyone knows everyone within one to two degrees of separation.

I cannot believe how there are some of us commuting from Chilliwack. Based on our estimations, we are comparably close in commute. The only difference is, they are in a car all of the way and I take my car, ferry, bus, and SkyTrain. A slight difference. I was also amazed how some of us live close to SFU Surrey but were also born very close to this location as well. My biggest aha is, we are coming from all different directions and making the effort to arrive in one place to teach and learn together. It broke some of my assumptions where I just believed were were all from SFU Surrey. I know… sounds ridiculous. Obviously we come from different places… and we do. Our final destination in this activity is to stand where we would like to live in the future. I did not stray too far away… but I liked how I was close to those who wanted to live on Vancouver Island.

Personally, I cannot stop thinking about this activity. It has many connections and opportunities for those who are learning Math 8 and 9 or Workplace Math 10. Distance, referents, ratios, rates, frequency, and direction… and making a personal connection to place and land. This is a very nice activity for those engaging in BC’s New Curriculum. I think about comparing and contrasting distance, students talking about where they are from, and assess whether flag were situated in a reasonable place. From a social studies perspective, you can look at population density, Indigenous lands, locations of where people live and why, transportation, and the carbon footprint. There are many possibilities and extensions that can be taken with this learning activity, but time is limited.

Back inside… We head into our warm up activity. Love this. The two other students took samples of leaves from their backyards and asked us to take an imprint of them. I loved one student’s story of taking an interest in the plants around her home and how her grandpa got super excited. I love that connection between family and place. It was a beautiful narrative that played as an awesome hook to the activity. It was clear to me that content knowledge would have been nice. Life sciences was not my strength, thus identifying these leaves was challenging, but I appreciated how diverse the leaves were and intrigued by the patterns of the veins. From this curiosity, it could easily spring board into ideas of photosynthesis, osmosis, water absorption, surface area, and cell biology. I also wonder about Fibonacci Sequences in nature and Fractals as another application of math. I enjoyed this warm-up activity and how it could be brought back into high school mathematics and science. To go further, how does this connect to Gillian Judson’s walking curriculum and familiarizing students with place, science, and local plants.

We head into our weekly reading summary oral presentations. What fascinated me about this presentation is, the 2 presenters collaborated their presentations. They were tasked with summarizing the second half of Gillian Judson’s book, A Walking Curriculum, but most of the content were sample walks. Some of these walks focussed on secondary students. Most of my class is composed of secondary pre-service teachers. I can see some of there skepticism because we continue with the same question over and over again… how do we get outside? Which is followed up with, how can we manage behaviour and stay on task when we are outside? These are two very good questions that they have faced as pre-service teachers and will face as teachers. Much depends on the school district, their policies, and strategic plan. On the Sunshine Coast, one of our goals in the strategic plan is ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION and we have a K-7 Nature School. We encourage our educators and students to get outside, so it would be reasonable that our policies and regulations follow suit. And, we hope students are getting outside.

Students made the best of this weekly reading summary by sharing a story… a narrative… with respect to Gillian Judson’s book. One student started the presentation talking about the limitations of the book and complimented the reading with a book called, “Why Indigenous Literatures Matter.” She read a passage from the book talking about the importance of place. She then went on describing her experience with the book and selected one of the walks (something about aliens) that caught her curiosity and engaged in the walk as learner. She shared her experience with the class with what she experienced and how she documented her learning. I was so enamoured by her willingness and creativity to make the book meaningful and connected to her learning.

The other student followed Kim with her story… it was a reflective story about her experience on practicum. It was one about a student who needed to go for a walk as a time out… or as the slide suggests from Gillian Judson’s book, A Mental Health Walk. It was a nice reflection about how this student struggled in school and how the walk helped the student to gather their thoughts and come back to class in a productive way. One thing I know for sure is, we just don’t know people’s stories. A plan was made for this student to self-regulate their behaviour as the year progressed. It seemed to be working until this student was identified as a hall wander. She was no longer allowed to leave class. This put a strain on the student teacher and school advisor. The mental health walked worked for this student but now a school wide rule inhibited this strategy. You can see that this would lend itself to a lengthy conversation on “what’s the right thing to do?” Challenging for a new teacher, but it’s about finding a way to rationalize what works for one student may not for others. Thank you for sharing your stories with us.

Finally… the closing activity… with THE CLOSER (and opener of today’s class). She got us to all fill out a YES/NO survey questionnaire about environmental education where quantitative approaches were embedded in the question like economics. We all answered the questions and threw our responses on the floor. It kind of felt good… throwing “garbage” on the floor. All submissions were anonymous. When we were done, we each picked up a ball from the floor and stood in front of the room in a circle. For each question, we were to put up our hands if our paper said YES. These were really great questions because they were so controversial. For each question, Kelly took a tally of YESs. From this data collection, she would pick out one or two questions that were about 50/50 and start a discussion from that. We talked about if bees were extinct, would we still be able to grow food. The other topic we discussed was petroleum products.

This conversation led to another great conversation of how this activity could be used in the classroom. It keeps anonymity. I LOVE THAT. You get students contributing their opinions. It could be used as a formative assessment tool to see where students are. It could also be used as a summative assessment tool to put information learning into action with a debate or evidenced based discussion. I love that we can take these activities that we are sharing with each other and be able to see the possibilities in them and how it could be used in the classroom. I will definitely use this activity in a future class to create a discussion. Low risk. Thought provoking. Dialogical. Formative. All good things.

Weekly Journal Questions

What tools will you use to create an imaginative context for your students’ learning in and outdoors?

I think we are doing it. A tough question as a question to answer as a journal or discussion question, but as we are proceeding in this course, student are TINKERING with possible tools and participating in learning activities that can provoke the imagination and be outside. I do like that we a learners and teachers have the opportunity to play and learn. This is definitely a personalized task. I love what I am witnessing from my students and I encourage them to push the boundaries to see what’s possible. We are playing.

How will you engage imagination in the assessment/evaluation of students’ outdoor learning?

Another great question from Gillian Judson. Again, we are figuring that out. We can get caught up in our traditions of assessment and evaluation. Just this week, a couple of students asked for feedback on their grade. I said that they are getting an “A” and the activities we are engaged are subjected to real-time, ongoing formative assessment. No learning activities would end unless it met my expectations (i.e. single point rubric). There are 3 summative assessments were traditional “grading” shall we say will be implemented at the END of the learning process. This class is not about accruing points or marks en route to the end of the course. The summative assessment, or evaluation of the student’s understanding and learning within the course is saved until the end of the course. This needed to be reiterated to the class via email, which is OK. Assessment and evaluation are habituated into our teaching and learning. I am trying to adhere to this concept of formative and summative. Students are learning too. This will take time to develop.

What are you learning about student led learning?

What I am learning is, IT’S AMAZING!!! This is what personalized learning should look like. Do what’s important to the student to learn and my role is to be the guide on the side. This makes sense to me. The diversity and creativity that is coming from my students are AMAZING and I truly believe that if we were driven my incremental marking, the quality of work would not be as good. Thank you to all of my students for taking the risk to try something new, collaborate with others, and define what Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education means to you. I really appreciate it.

Time Constraints

#EDUC454E100 – Week 5 – June 7, 2018

As mentioned in my previous blog, this EDUC454 class is engaging and dialogical. I like how we are able to delve into conversation to establish a deeper understanding of what we are learning about. That said, we are quickly running out of time. It’s a crazy idea to think that I might be over prepping. I think that I am just prepping and the students are carrying the torch with their teaching and learning. It’s one of many things I am exploring in my practice. How do we shift teaching and learning from student ENGAGEMENT to EMPOWERMENT. This idea comes from George Couros and the #InnovatorsMindset.

One of the things that I am working on in my teaching practice is transforming my role from “teacher” (aka. bearer of all knowledge) to “facilitator” of learning (aka. designing the class in such a way so that the students co-construct their knowledge together). I love the idea of building a learning community amongst ourselves. I am always surprised and grateful for what students have to contribute… particularly pre-service teachers. It’s also a time for them to PLAY and try new ideas in context to this course (Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education). At the same time, I am trying to model BC’s New Curriculum with personalized learning, formative feedback, and student-led learning.

My job is to create the framework, guide their learning, provide feedback, and ultimately evaluate their understanding/learning from the course. Their job is to learn what they want to learn within the context of the course, teach others what they have learned, and reflect upon what they have learned and how it would apply to their future careers as BC educators. As a result, the EDUC454 students are deeply engaged in what they are doing, prepping learning activities, and participating in what their peers have prepared for them. I also appreciated our guest speakers, Dave Barnum and Dr. Gillian Judson, who spoke to our class about place and space. They too took an experiential approach to learning.

The first 5 photos of this blog attempt to capture our first GROUP FACILITATION learning activity where groups of 3-4 students facilitate a learning activity that captures Quantitative Environmental Approaches to Environmental Education in a subject area or areas of choice. It’s an application of what this could be and their job it to teach what they have learned in an interactive class oriented way. Three students facilitated the first of three segments of their “Citizen Science” Unit Plan called SENSORY OBSERVATION. Citizen science means that anybody can collect and contribute data. The data collected can form a sense of knowing or understanding. It has an excellent exemplar of Indigenous ways of knowing, as discussed in the group facilitation activity.

GROUP 2 started the group facilitation learning activity by reading us a book called the “The Snowy Day.” A short discussion ensued after about why was this story book selected for today’s group facilitation. The resounding answer was EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION. We talked about our 5 senses and the group asked the class to find a place in Holland Park and focus on the sense of HEARING. We were asked to take a moment to listen to our surroundings, then report back what we had heard. This was amazing. Many of us closed our eyes so that we could listen. As mentioned in my last blog… IT’S LOUD. There was no road construction this week, but I heard planes, vehicles, leaves, basketball bouncing, and birds. I was also able to briefly experience Gillian Judson’s ACTIVENESS. I was engaged with my surroundings and my sense of space via my body. We then repeated the activity being aware of our kinesthetic sense. That was a bit tougher. The group facilitation concluded with what is CITIZEN SCIENCE and how this could be applied in science.

Thank you GROUP 2 for getting our class started on group facilitation learning activities OUTSIDE, for taking the time to collaborate and plan together, and to demonstrate for us how you can share your learning with us is an interactive and participatory way. I loved our post-chat and how we could have done one more sense like touch, I loved how one student was prepared to give a concrete example of Citizen Science with her passion for bees and POLLINATORS, and I loved how student input exceeded your expectations in such a way that it turned out better than you had hoped or planned. That was amazing!!!

I was so happy to have our first group facilitation activity situated outside. It was a nice continuation of what we had experienced with Gillian Judson the week before, but also Dave Barnum’s presentation on place and space. I also appreciated how Gillian’s talk from last week transferred into our learning this week with our group facilitation and the number of students who referred to that learning experience. However, this week was “catch up” week. Because of our enthusiasm and collective engagement, we postponed a few of our student-led presentations to the following week… for a couple of weeks. Thus making THIS WEEK the week to catch up on what we had intended in our schedule.

After the break, and returning back to our classroom (on the 5th floor), we resumed with the weekly reading summaries oral presentations. We had 2 presentations from Week 4 and 2 presentations for Week 5. Normally, I would ask the students to compose an oral summary and have 2 questions to pose to the class for discussion. This week, the students were limited to no more than 10 minutes to present and present 1-2 questions for the weekly journal for students to respond to. A slight adaptation to what was intended but these students were up for the challenge. What was interesting to me was, with each pair of presenters for each week, one would summarize the assigned reading and the other took a personal account or personal experience to depict or model what they had read. I could not have planned it out more perfectly. I’m not sure if the students had planned it that way, but it was brilliant. I also believe that we had more that 8 questions for students to choose from and reflect on for the weekly journal. Well done!!!

After very swift transitions between each oral presenter for the weekly reading summaries, we managed to take the time to discuss the reading as a class. I think were were afforded this luxury of time because the group facilitation activity ended 20 minutes early. This was awesome because it gave the class the opportunity to grapple with the ideas of Trevor MacKenzie’s “Jump Into Inquiry” and discuss what they would do in class and why. I loved the class conversation about teaching and inquiry-based learning. It’s something that we are all wrestling with and taking the moment to examine and imagine what it would look like in our future teaching practice. Soon after the class discussion (anyway), we swiftly transitioned to our three remaining warm-up activities… one from Week 4 and two for Week 5. The adaptation for these learning activities was NOT to discuss the Core Competencies, but keep them in mind, and limited to 20 minutes.

One activity got student to go out into the mall and FIND MATH on their phones and compare with other groups. POINTS were given out to the most original pictures. The second group got the class to make pinwheels and focus on deep breathing and mindfulness. The final person, Liam (aka. the closer) got us all to sit in a circle and figure out who was tapped on the shoulder and take a moment to figure out “who’s the liar.” Deductive reasoning. Non-verbal cues. LISTENING again… and nice follow up to our class from the group facilitation earlier on the senses. It turned out, of course, the liar was him… so think about your inquiry projects??? It was a fun way to end our class ON-TIME.

Weekly Journal Questions:

What are some strengths of applying inquiry to a classroom? What are some struggles? 

Inquiry can give students some personal freedom and autonomy of their learning. They have choice. They can delve deeper into a topic of interest or passion. They can find learning more meaningful. Some struggles would be differentiating learning (not all students operating at the same level of independence). Another struggle would be assessment and evaluation. When all projects are not aiming towards the same goal (of sameness), it can be challenging to evaluate. For example, if the product is a paper versus a video blog as a demonstration of learning, how can you tell the difference? Grading must be based on a set of curricular competencies to be found in all projects.

Is it true inquiry if the students are not come up with their own essential questions or topics?

Inquiry, in my mind, is to be curious. If the student does not come up with their own essential question, but the teacher did, then the inquiry is guided. That’s OK. There can be varying levels of inquiry, as mentioned in Trevor MacKenzie’s book. It does not need to be FREE INQUIRY all of the time. I do suggest that the student has to have some choice in the project so that they can be agents of their own learning. Offering a specific set of choices versus unlimited is OK. It just can’t all be about compliance and conforming.

How could you see yourself working with your teacher librarian?

If I was back in the K-12 classroom, I would be all over the teacher librarian… particularly now that most are being restored in schools. They are experts in “library” and research. They have the skills and knowledge to helps students (and me) on what’s available, how to find useful information, and how to discern through information that goes beyond Google. I’m a math and science teacher, so having the teacher library provide a social science approach to compliment my teaching and learning practice PLUS the opportunity to collaborate with another teacher in the school in a different space is a WIN!!!

How you been inspired to being planning something based on MacKenzie’s book? 

I liked how Trevor MacKenzie reflects about his practice in his book. That inspired me to use his book as one of the required readings for EDUC454 this term. Last term, I had only used articles about nature-based education, environmental education, and experiential education to be my required readings. This term, I decided to look at Inquiry-Based Learning from Trevor Mackenzie and A Walking Curriculum by Dr. Gillian Judson instead of some readings. Dave Barnum did bring back some of the readings I would have assigned into his presentation. Assigning this book was my first step into inquiry and I was curious if it would help my students with their inquiry projects for this course. We soon shall see.

I want to thank my students who were present this week for making this happen… taking on the challenge of TIME CONSTRAINTS and catching us up for Week 6. I still have things I would like to accomplish, but I am happy that we are back on track and class will resume as intended this week. I am looking forward to using Gillian Judson’s book to formulate a “field trip” for my class on Week 13. I am embracing this challenge to see how this resource applies in higher education and particularly in EDUC454, and because my students want to end the course with a class “party” (during an evening course at Surrey Campus) has now it’s become a LEARNING PARTY of Quantitative Approaches to Environmental Education via A Walking Curriculum. Let’s see how this goes. SURPRISE!!!