Tokenized Learning – December 22, 2010

A teacher’s educational philosophy is often guided or tainted by past experiences.  Lortie (1975) calls this phenomena “Apprenticeship of Observation.”  From kindergarten to grade 12 and beyond, we have been observing many teachers for thousands of hours over a 13 to 18 year period.  We have favorite teachers, we have teachers we did not like.  All in all, it is easy to understand why public education is often under scrutiny because people, in general, have many years of experience observing teachers.

One of my ‘beefs’ about education is TOKENIZED LEARNING.  My defining moment did not occur with a teacher, but with my father.  In high school, I was a competitive curler and my curling team was on our way to the provincials.  My dad baited me with a walkman (yes, I’m dating myself) to enhance my performance and motivate me to win.  We were runner-up and I walked away empty handed.  I wanted to win for the wrong reasons.  I wasn’t focused on playing well, I was focused on winning.

In education, learning is often tokenized.  Do this assignment, it’s worth marks.  Act in a particular way, that’s worth more marks.  The learning process becomes more about accruing marks versus learning for the sake of learning.  The drive is a pull, not a push.  Teachers take on this responsibility.  As a result, “learners” become more motivated by the extrinsic rewards and not by passion, genuine interest, or curiosity.  Life-long learning is not about acquiring “the token,” it’s about the love.